In the ongoing FTX fraud trial, Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal team has disclosed key aspects of his planned testimony if he chooses to take the stand. Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the disgraced FTX chief, faces a daunting set of seven criminal charges, including wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering, which could potentially result in a prison sentence exceeding 100 years if he is convicted in Manhattan federal court. SBF has steadfastly maintained his innocence in the case.
The question of whether or not SBF will testify remains uncertain according to a news report. While earlier in the day, one of his primary trial attorneys, Mark Cohen, suggested that he would indeed testify, a subsequent letter to the presiding judge, Lewis Kaplan, raises doubts about this commitment. Cohen’s letter outlines SBF’s intentions for his testimony, focusing on three key areas.
First, SBF’s defense plans to argue that he relied on FTX’s former legal team for guidance on certain actions that ultimately contributed to the cryptocurrency exchange’s collapse and bankruptcy. The defense contends that these actions were taken in good faith, believing they were in line with the advice of their legal counsel.
The defense will also highlight SBF’s understanding of common industry practices. This understanding will be used to justify his actions, suggesting that he operated within the boundaries of accepted practices in the cryptocurrency industry.
Lastly, SBF’s testimony will emphasise his intention to comply with Bahamian authorities. This aspect of his testimony is crucial in light of allegations that he attempted to transfer assets to Bahamian liquidators following FTX’s bankruptcy, indicating his willingness to cooperate with the authorities.
Judge Kaplan had previously ruled against allowing an “advice of counsel” argument in the trial’s opening remarks to avoid prejudicing the jury. However, Cohen’s recent letter to the judge asserts that SBF’s knowledge of his legal counsel’s involvement is directly relevant to his state of mind and good faith when making crucial decisions. The defense cites specific instances where FTX lawyers guided SBF in adopting certain policies, which the prosecution has argued demonstrate criminal intent.
One notable example relates to the use of the encrypted messaging app Signal. SBF allegedly directed FTX and Alameda employees to use the app’s auto-delete feature to minimise the paper trail due to potential legal exposure. The defense argues that this policy was implemented under the counsel’s guidance, indicating a good faith approach.
In another case, billions of dollars in FTX customer deposits were channelled into an account controlled by Alameda, a crypto hedge fund. The prosecution claims that customer cash was funnelled to Alameda through various means, including a secret backdoor in FTX’s code. SBF’s defense argues that his understanding of counsel’s involvement in forming these accounts and payment arrangements is critical to establishing his good faith belief in the legitimacy of these actions.
SBF’s trust in Bahamian authorities will also be a focal point of his testimony. He reportedly believed that transferring assets to Bahamian liquidators would help maintain control of FTX, suggesting his commitment to comply with their orders. The defense asserts that his belief in the Bahamian authorities’ good intentions, as opposed to those of FTX’s in-house and U.S. bankruptcy counsel, is pivotal in understanding his actions.
Additionally, SBF’s comprehension of common industry practices, specifically related to the use of omnibus wallets, will play a significant role in his testimony. The cryptocurrency industry often employs omnibus accounts to consolidate digital assets from multiple users into a single account, streamlining operations and reducing costs. The prosecution has raised concerns about the mingling of customer and company assets in FTX’s use of omnibus wallets.
The defense contends that SBF’s knowledge of industry practices regarding omnibus wallets demonstrates his good faith belief that his actions were in line with standard industry practices. By highlighting this understanding, they aim to establish that he operated within the boundaries of accepted practices in the cryptocurrency sector.
Whether SBF takes the stand and provides this testimony remains uncertain, but it is clear that his defense strategy will revolve around these key elements. In the meantime, the crypto community eagerly awaits the outcome of this trial that could potentially reshape the landscape of legal accountability in the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies.
Stay informed with our Bi-Weekly Pulse for the latest crypto and blockchain news.
Get access to the week’s most interesting reads, stats and find out about the most recent trends in the cryptocurrency market.